Friday, November 6, 2009

America's dirtiest vehicles: Fuel economy isn't everything

Friday Nov. 6, 2009 4:39 PM ET

Just because a car has low fuel efficiency doesn't mean it's the worst polluter on the road. The Chevrolet Suburban and Dodge Challenger are some of the biggest gas-gulpers available, but they don't cause quite the environmental harm other cars do.

That title is reserved for vehicles that combine their poor gas mileage with high tailpipe and greenhouse gas emissions. Think along the lines of some of the bulkiest cars on the road, like the Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chevrolet Trailblazer and Dodge Dakota.

While fuel economy is linked to emissions, it's not the only factor. Pollution levels also have to do with the type of fuel being used and the age and condition of the engine, among other things.

"You can have a really fuel-efficient, dirty vehicle and a really clean, not-so-fuel-efficient vehicle," says Karl Simon, a director of compliance and innovation for the EPA's Office of Transportation and Air Quality. "It really is pretty wide open from a technical perspective."

Behind the Numbers

To determine the dirtiest cars on America's roads, we used air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The EPA rates air pollution on a scale of 0 to 10; the score reflects the amount of tailpipe emissions a vehicle releases. Vehicles that score 10 are the cleanest--they don't emit pollutants like hydrocarbon, nitrous oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide and formaldehyde. Greenhouse gas levels (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane) are based on the vehicle's fuel economy and are evaluated on the same 0-10 scale. That score represents the "relative global warming potential of each car," the EPA says.

For our list, we combined air pollution and emissions scores and then chose the vehicles with the smallest results (the greater the score, the more environmentally friendly the car). We broke ties by evaluating the combined fuel efficiency of each vehicle. (Driving a car that gets 25 miles per gallon rather than 20 mpg will prevent 10 tons of carbon dioxide from hitting the air over a vehicle's lifetime, according to EPA data.) We did not evaluate models that will end production after this year, like the Bentley Arnage and Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster, or vehicles classified as "heavy duty," like the 3500 series of the Dodge Ram, which are exempt from federal fuel economy requirements.

We also deliberately omitted some vehicles that rated higher on the particulate-emissions scale, including exotics like the Ferrari F430, uber-luxury cars like the Bentley Continental Flying Spur, and high-performance variants from Mercedes-Benz's AMG line. Those cars have marginally worse emissions ratings than some of the entries on our list but are produced in such small quantities and driven so infrequently--on weekends or on racetracks--that they often don't contribute much to air-pollution problems.

Lonnie Miller, an automotive analyst for R.L. Polk, says it's OK that performance and design dictate the aim of those vehicles, while others emphasize fuel economy and practicality. There's a place in the market for each type, he says.

Repeat Offender

Even had we included those supercars, though, the Jeep Grand Cherokee still would have topped the chart. It scored a paltry three out of 10 for air-pollution ratings and two out of 10 for greenhouse gas emissions. The flex-fuel engine--prized because it uses a renewable resource that reduces dependency on traditional gasoline--on the Cherokee was even worse: three out of 10 and one out of 10 for the air pollution and gas emissions, respectively.

In terms of finger-pointing, however, it's not just Jeep maker Chrysler that needs to clean up its act. In all, cars and trucks account for almost one-third of the total air pollution in the United States. And while EPA emission standards have gotten increasingly strict since they first were instituted in the early 1970s, there's still a long way to go, especially at home: 60 per cent of the entries on our list are from domestic automakers. The remainder are German; no Japanese or Korean cars make the list.

Of American automakers, though, Chrysler is the worst offender, with six vehicles on last year's "dirtiest" list (the Jeep Commander, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango, Chrysler Aspen, Dodge Ram 1500 and Dodge Dakota), and five this year.

It's important to note that each of the cars on our list are street legal--and much cleaner than anything on the road years ago.

"We continue to drive our fleet average even lower," Chrysler spokesman Nick Cappa said in a written response to the rankings. "Chrysler Group products are 99 per cent cleaner than vehicles of 30 years ago and meet or exceed United States federal emission standards, the most stringent in the world."

Going Clean

Many auto manufacturers are making concerted efforts to produce models that are easier on the environment; most offer hybrid, compact or turbocharged 4-cylinder versions, all of which record low pollutant scores. Next year will see the long-awaited arrival of several low- and emission-free options, like the compact but "ecoboosted" Ford Fiesta and the plug-in electric Chevrolet Volt.

Some high-end carmakers are making considerable emissions efforts as well, but don't look to them for the latest in high-volume electric technology. It's prohibitively expensive and technologically difficult to get anywhere near the same performance out of an electric motor as a combustion engine, and aside from notable entries from Tesla and (perhaps) Fisker, it will be years before any meaningful amount of electric motors find their way into high-performance and luxury cars.

Besides, there's much to be done to improve the combustion engine, engineers from Bentley, BMW and Porsche say, either through increasing its efficiency or developing alternative fuels. Bentley developed the flex-fuel-capable, US$245,000 Continental Supersports coupe for that very reason.

"We believe bioethanol is a really good alternative to reducing CO2 emissions," says Brian Gush, Bentley's director of chassis and powertrain engineering. "This is a renewable source, which will be growing into the future."

Simon at the EPA says emissions levels have indeed improved significantly over the last 20 years and will continue to do so. But with 40,000 Jeep Grand Cherokees sold this year so far, there's a long way to go.

Methodology

To determine the dirtiest cars on America's roads, we used air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA rates air pollution on a scale of 0 to 10; the score reflects the amount of tailpipe emissions a vehicle releases. (Vehicles that score 10 are the cleanest--they don't emit pollutants like hydrocarbon, nitrous oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide and formaldehyde.) Greenhouse gas levels (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane) are based on the vehicle's fuel economy and evaluated on the same 0-10 scale. For our list, we combined air-pollution and emissions scores and then chose the vehicles with the smallest results (the larger the score, the more environmentally friendly the car). We broke ties by considering the combined fuel efficiency of each vehicle.

States With The Most Expensive Cars

Experian analysts tallied the number of registrations of all new models sold in the 50 states and the District of Columbia for the reporting period of September 2008 to August 2009. The numbers reflect individual registrations, not fleet or business sales.

Such data help manufacturers know their strongest markets--and learn where they can improve. The information helps automakers define and satisfy their customer, says Jeff Anderson, director of consulting and analytics for Experian Automotive--which is especially important in such a loyalty-driven industry.

Almost 70% of consumers purchase the same make or brand as their current vehicle, according to an Oct. 28 study by the global consulting firm Capgemini. That number is up from 61% last year. A full 63% of respondents said they would purchase from the same dealer where they bought their current car. Its a sign of the times, says Joseph Oddo, a senior manager at Capgemini.

"There is an uptick as far as brand loyalty and as far as consumer satisfaction with the buying process," he says, noting that luxury dealerships do particularly well at creating repeat customers.. "You go to a brand you know, that you can trust--especially with high-ticket items like a vehicle."

Pockets of Luxury The big three sellers on our luxury list are Lexus (153,809 units sold nationwide), BMW (144,472 units sold nationwide) and Mercedes-Benz (131,146 units sold nationwide).

In California, consumers tend to buy German: Drivers there are more than twice as likely to buy a BMW than any other luxury brand. In fact, the big two German automakers made the No. 1 or No. 2 slots in all 10 states that landed on our list. California, Florida, New York and Texas--in that order--were the top-selling states for each of those brands.

Florida is the standout, as it has a smaller population than both New York and Texas (18.3 million compared to 19.5 million and 24.3 million), but it outsells both of them when it comes to luxury cars. Almost 14% of all cars sold in Florida are from luxury brands, versus 11% in New York and just 6% in Texas--which is even more remarkable because the median income for Florida last year ($48,095) was less than that of New York ($51,763).

It could be partly because Miami in particular is experiencing a cultural renaissance. Sissy DeMaria, the president of Kreps DeMaria, a Miami-based marketing firm, says Latin American developers--who have escaped the recession largely unscathed--have dramatically boosted the local economy by investing heavily in luxury hotels, retail outlets and million-dollar homes around the city. “Miami is for sale,” DeMaria says. That influx of funds likely applies to cars as well.

If you liked this story, read:

Spyker's New Supercar

Bentley's New Luxury Car

What You'll Drive In 2010

The northern U.S. tells a different story. German automakers BMW and Mercedes sell many more units in Los Angeles than in Detroit: "Domestics and Japanese reign supreme in Motown," says Mike Caudill, an automotive expert for the vehicle data Web site NADA Guides. Cadillac sold 3,000 more cars in Michigan than any of its luxury competitors.

Maserati topped the list among brands that sell 1,200 models a year or less in all but three states: New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Drivers in those states seem to prefer their cars to be of British heritage--Bentley registered 63 units in New Jersey and 20 in Pennsylvania. Aston Martin registered 20 cars in Virginia, which Anderson says makes sense when you consider that the staid wealth that has accumulated around the nation's capital is likely to prefer an understated vehicle, rather than something flashier, like a Ferrari.

And while neither appears on the final list, two other European brands-- Rolls-Royce ( RYCEY.PK - news - people ) and Maybach--reported disproportionately high (albeit extremely exclusive) registration numbers in Nevada. That's thanks, no doubt, to the real estate titans and entertainment moguls in Las Vegas, Anderson says.

So why are Lamborghinis so popular in Missouri? For the same reason they are anywhere else a Lambo dealership opens.

"It's the bravado of the Lamborghini, the attraction," Burks says. "The extreme aggressiveness of the car basically just draws people to the brand." Even in a state where most people drive a Chevy.

In Depth: States With The Most Expensive Cars

Alonso: No regrets about Renault year

Fernando Alonso says he completely respected Renault's decision to abandon trying to turn its 2009 car around even though it meant his final races with his long-time team were disappointing.

Renault had hoped to turn its brilliant late-2008 form into a 2009 title challenge, but it was off the pace for much of the year and turned its attention to its 2010 design in mid-summer.

Having already agreed to join Ferrari next year, Alonso had nothing to gain from Renault's shift in focus, but accepted that it was the right thing for the team to do as next season's rules are sufficiently different to make an early start worthwhile.

"Next year is more or less the same in terms of aerodynamics, so for sure what you did this year could help, but I think with the narrow front tyres, with the big fuel tanks, the cars will have to change and we'll have to prepare the cars in a different way for the fuel loads," he said.

"Until the first race next year we will not know [if it paid off].

"Renault stopped developing earlier and I perfectly understand the decision.

"Hopefully they can have a good car next year."

Alonso didn't feel his last season with Renault was a total write-off even though it didn't live up to expectations.

"I think aerodynamics have been key to the last few years in Formula 1, but even more this year with the new rules," he said.

"Unfortunately the philosophy of our car was not good enough.

"We cannot forget that at some races we were competitive.

"In one period of the championship we put some new things on the car and we were maybe the third fastest car on the grid.

"But then we decided to stop the development of the car and think more of 2010, and at every race you pay for that a little bit.

"We arrived at the last race with the same car we had for five months."

In Abu Dhabi Alonso ended his Renault career with his worst weekend for the team, qualifying 16th and finishing 14th, but he said the car had been that uncompetitive for some time and had just been flattered by circumstances in the preceding races.

"Somehow we managed to go through Q1 [in earlier races], and then somehow we went into Q3 a couple of times as well," said the Spaniard.

"I think the circumstances were a little bit special - like at Suzuka the first laps in the dry were on Saturday and in Brazil the conditions were extremely wet and we were lucky on that side to be in Q3.

"In Abu Dhabi we were out in Q1 and that was more or less what we expected.

"The team knows that I gave 100 per cent in the last seven years with them, so the last race doesn't change too much."

Congratulations to Steve Jobs, Fortune's CEO of the decade

November 5, 2009 6:57 PM PST How does Apple or Microsoft - figure in this?

An award like this is based on actual acchievement - Steve Jobs career from the first Apple in 1976-1977 to date has been continuously at the leading edge of that part of the computer revolution where he found himself working. The only other equally long tenure of continuous innovation is probably held by Seymour Cray. Gene Amdahl too had a long innings.

Who else has innovated so successfully and for so long?

Good on you Mr. Jobs - it is a pleasure to see you get the recognition you have earned by bringing so much pleasure and delight to millions :)) Reply to this comment by DragonWizard November 5, 2009 7:17 PM PST Here we go with the Mac vs PC crap.. Why does every story about anything to do with computers end up with a bunch of people flamin' each other... Mac ...PC who cares.. Use what you like but at least find another thing to cry about.. This thing makes me sick.. You mention Steve Jobs or anyone microsoft and you get this same old tired sh*t flingin' dialogue from both sides.. I guess their is plenty of stupidity for both sides of this junk... you guys should get a life and quit makin' it your lifes desire to make someone else look like an idiot because they use a different brand of computing.... what a really silly thing to make others have to listen to... You all sound like a bunch of grammar school kids.. GROW UP or get off this site.. We people, who like something intelligent to think about find you all to be most embarrassing. I guess you just can't see how absolutely ridiculous you appear to anyone with an IQ over 100... Every one of these stories always has some idiot trying to be funny and saying something they think is cute or ingenious but just sounds immature at best.. Go hang out on UTube or somewhere they appreciate ignorance as an art form... Reply to this comment

Out of my dreams and into my car

Megan Fox

Megan Fox

English pop star Cheryl Cole has topped a list of women who men fantasise about having as a passenger.

English pop star Cheryl Cole has topped a list of women who men fantasise about having as a passenger.

And what car would they most like to be in with Cole? A Bugatti Veyron.

A recent poll run by the MSN Cars website found men fantasise about driving with Cole more than any other woman, including Megan Fox (pictured). More than 13,000 website visitors participated.

Cole took 24 per cent of the "perfect passenger" vote, Fox scored 21 per cent and Jessica Alba 12 per cent.

At 36 per cent, the Veyron topped the "perfect car" list, followed by Aston Martin's One-77 at 29 per cent and the Ferrari California at 9 per cent.

Source: The Sydney Morning Herald

Tour of Scott Rothstein's office reveals gallery of who's who

Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein's office was a secured inner sanctum, complete with video cameras, second entrance and hidden private elevator.

It also was a shrine to himself, plastered with photos showing Rothstein embracing powerful politicians, framed thank-you letters from charities and candidates he lavished with generous donations, grown-up toys like red Ferrari model cars, and a Richard Nixon action figure.

Amid a federal investigation into allegations that Rothstein was running a massive Ponzi scheme, his law partners at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler invited the media to tour the private office Thursday. A hired PR man and a lawyer portrayed the office's opulence, security and compartmentalized layout as evidence that even the partners were bamboozled by their hard-charging friend and colleague.

``Many people asked how is it possible that the attorneys didn't know about Mr. Rothstein's alleged activities?'' said spokesman Charles Jones. ``We attempted to describe how Mr. Rothstein walled himself off from the firm. We believed the only way to get that message through was to show the layout of the office and the security system.''

Investors and law partners have accused Rothstein, 47, of cleaning them out of well over $100 million in a purported side business that he ran under the mantle of the law firm. He has been cooperating with U.S. prosecutors since his return from Morocco on Tuesday, providing details and identifying others who may have been involved.

Rothstein, who has not been charged, is staying at an undisclosed location in South Florida under federal surveillance. On Tuesday, a judge removed him as chief executive officer of the firm and appointed a receiver to unravel its finances.

The tour came just hours after FBI and IRS agents raided the firm at 401 E. Las Olas Blvd. Wednesday night. Agents left at 3:15 a.m. Thursday with 44 boxes of documents, including financial and computer records and the key to Rothstein's Ferrari.

SUPPOSED UNSEEN

Firm co-founder Stuart Rosenfeldt has said he had no clue about Rothstein's alleged investment scam, and that Rothstein alone handled all firm finances. Some legal observers find that difficult to swallow.

Attorney William Scherer, who represents a dozen investors out some $80 million, said Thursday that lawsuits are in the works against banks, insurance policies and Rothstein's assets.

But Jones and attorney Kendall Coffey -- a former U.S. attorney who was hired to represent the firm just before the scandal broke last weekend -- held the tour to show how other lawyers might not have known what Rothstein was doing.

Anyone entering Rothstein's suite of offices had to use an intercom. If Rothstein wanted to leave without being seen, he could exit through a second door. In the hallway, what appears to be an ordinary looking brown door is actually the elevator door.

Coffey described that elevator as ``an extraordinary feature not seen in any law firm.''

Dozens of surveillance cameras and microphones hang from office ceilings. They were turned off a few days ago, and federal authorities were given access to whatever had been previously recorded, Coffey said.

Outside Rothstein's personal office: a painting of Al Pacino as his character Michael Corleone in The Godfather.

The walls of Rothstein's office and other hallways are lined with framed photos of the lawyer with politicians including Gov. Charlie Crist, former U.S. Senator Mel Martinez, U.S. Senator John McCain and Broward Sheriff Al Lamberti.

Manufacturer exodus all part of the cycle

Will Gray Manufacturer exodus all part of the cycle

Fri Nov 06 09:36AM

Renault Ferrari may have made a theatrical statement about their views on Formula One's manufacturer exodus - but motorsport history shows this re-privatisation of the sport was always on the cards.

Toyota's decision to quit the sport immediately, followed by Renault's admission that they cannot rule out doing the same, has sent more shockwaves through Formula One. In a period of less than a year the sport has lost Honda, BMW and Toyota, leaving Renault and Ferrari as the only manufacturer teams remaining.

The constant bickering seen this season between the manufacturers and the governing body over the future regulations and different budget-cutting solutions have certainly unsettled the sport, but Ferrari's almost childish suggestions that the manufacturers have been ‘bullied' out of the sport are surely farcical.

In reality, the manufacturer-filled grids of two years ago were never healthy for the sport - which is why the FIA battled so hard to make life easier for the independents and ensure not only that those in the sport were able to survive but also that the doors could easily be opened to others who wanted to come in and fill the space when the manufacturers walked away.

Many different series have experienced some sort of manufacturer yo-yo effect, but the British Touring Car Championship in the 1990s followed a fascinatingly similar path to current day Formula One.

The series always had a steady set of manufacturers but a strong media package and a new simple set of rules drew manufacturers in, leading to greater race attendances, larger television audiences around the world and increasing hype. In just two seasons the field grew from two works teams to eight and a few years later, at its height, ten different car manufacturers were on the grid.

But as competitiveness amongst the frontrunners increased, a lack of budget-trimming regulations saw the costs spiral and those who were not at the front had to face serious questions from their board members as to why. Certain teams dominated for a while, so rule changes such as one-shot qualifying were brought in to spice things up - but messing with the formula failed to achieve success.

Soon enough, the first few manufacturers began to pull out and others used the opportunity to do the same. As the amount of manufacturers reduced, the value offered from the series in terms of promotion for the other manufacturers (for there were fewer rivals to beat) also reduced and by 2000 there were just three left, each running three cars to make up the numbers and increase the quality of a field now filled with privateers.

Sound familiar?

If Renault do decide to follow the rest out the door, Ferrari will be the only manufacturer team (unless newcomers Lotus count, which I suppose by definition they should) - and whether or not they will need to run more cars to make up the numbers will only be clear as we head through the winter...

Comment on this article

Please sign in to add your comments.